Julian Teixeira, CRO @ 1Password: How to Hire and Train Your First Sales Hires
Julian Teixeira, CRO @ 1Password: How to Hire and Train Your First Sales Hires
Summary
- Julian Teixeira’s core reframe: a sales playbook is not a 20-page document, it’s “breaking down the anatomy of a win” — and it’s worthless without skills development: “you’re not hiring people to take orders, you’re hiring them to sell.” He strongly prefers the founder to write version one from the front line, because firsthand customer exposure is the leverage you need to “call BS on anyone else that you’re ultimately going to trust sales to in the future.”
- The bottom is dropping out of tech sales. A decade of up-and-to-the-right meant “it’s been easy for too long,” and “those easy times have bred a lot of mediocre talent”; today’s market resembles what 20-30-year veterans knew, and many who came in on charisma and earning potential “are just going to give up and drop out.” Stebbings goes further — most salespeople and sales leaders aren’t good — and Teixeira replies, “I don’t disagree with you at all.”
- 1Password flipped from ~99% inbound to a 54/46 outbound majority on converted deals in one year. Outbound closes at half the rate but for twice as much, and may take closer to 3-4 quarters versus ~2, because “the person we’re reaching out to doesn’t have a preconceived notion of what they want to buy — we are defining that from the get-go.” AEs who don’t self-generate pipeline: “just doesn’t work.”
- Structure follows how customers buy, not dogma: hunter-farmer made sense when 50,000 businesses used the product at under 2% penetration, but with a multi-product, land-and-expand motion “we were losing new business deals because we were pushing too hard to get too much upfront” — so 1Password goes hybrid next year. It’s also not verticalized: win rates, ACV, and time-to-close show “very, very little difference” across verticals.
- Goals and comp: start with team goals (they break within months to a year), build plans so ~70% of reps attain them, and keep comp simple enough that a rep can figure out “how they’re going to pay their mortgage without having to go through a ton of gymnastics.” Every goal set 20-30% above what seemed achievable ended 10% above the original “realistic” number even when missed.
- Segment economics: enterprise ACVs in the six figures with the first seven-figure customer landed this month, mid-market $50-100K, SMB a few thousand to $25-30K — most SMB motions pay for themselves 4x fully loaded, but there’s a ceiling, so 1Password is routing that cohort to MSPs and distributors rather than 10x-ing the machine.
- The buying environment has hardened: “the CFO suddenly has an interest in absolutely everything,” month-end discount pressure is “just dead,” and the leading deal-slippage risk is a missed procurement chain — so 1Password arms champions with the CFO’s questions and answers “without asking anything in return.”
Deep dive
1. A playbook is the anatomy of a win — and the founder writes it
- Teixeira hates the term playbook “because of what it stands for”: “it usually ends up looking like some 20-page document that you use to check a box.” His definition — “breaking down the anatomy of a win”: what steps should one repeat to have a higher rate of success in winning deals. But even that is only half of it: “without the right skills development, your playbook isn’t worth s*… you’re not hiring people to take orders, you’re hiring them to sell.”
- On who builds it, he strongly prefers the founder: it’s got to be the founder. Front-line exposure to how customers react to the pitch “is an important leverage that you then need to call [BS] on anyone else that you’re ultimately going to trust sales to in the future.” A capable first GTM hire can do the work, but the founder getting on the front line early is critical.
- The playbook “has got to start with hiring the right people” — the right intellect, curiosity, and discipline for the right phase of the journey. “No playbook is going to solve for that.”
2. Skip the fancy résumé, hire two at once, decide in three months
- For hire one, “sometimes the person with the fancy cover at the front of the book that’s touched the right companies at the right times is not what you want.” You want humility, patience, low ego, high curiosity — “somebody who has something to prove, has a chip on their shoulder” — focused on “the art of the possible,” not blaming the systems the company doesn’t have.
- Hire two at a time — “absolutely critical.” It creates chase-and-compete, and it’s a diagnostic: “if your sample size is one of one, it can be really challenging” to know whether failure is the person or a structural pattern.
- You know a bad hire within the first three months. Weeks one and two are listen-and-learn, and curiosity is the tell — asking about what you don’t understand rather than “nodding your head up and down.” After that: shadowing top reps, time in Gong, seeking extra one-on-one training.
- Stebbings’s skeptical follow-up — how many reps actually stay late for extra Gong calls? “For me it’s like none.” Teixeira’s concession: non-regrettable attrition is probably in the realm of 29-30% this year, and they’ve pushed vetting earlier into the hiring process — “but some people are just great interviewers.”
3. Team goals first, comp a rep can compute at the kitchen table
- Both Lightspeed and 1Password started with team goals — an “in it together” anchor while figuring out rep capacity from zero historicals, using spiffs to find “where does that back wall live.” It works “for a very, very, very short period” — a couple of months to six or seven — with individual goals inside the first year.
- Stebbings pushes: team goals seem incompatible with pitting reps against each other. Teixeira’s answer — individuals are still measured (“Harry has sold more than Julian this week; you need to catch up”); the team goal “is not meant to mask individual performance,” it’s a pay proxy during level-setting, and in a small team “you don’t want to be the one who’s dragging everyone else behind.”
- Comp design: the simpler the better — “your rep should be able to understand how much they’re going to earn and how they’re going to pay their mortgage without having to go through a ton of gymnastics” — and it should change as company focus changes (multi-product, multi-year deals).
- The stretch math: plans are built so ~70% of people can achieve them, and “every time that I’ve set a goal that is at least 20 or 30% higher than I think we’re capable of achieving, even when we don’t achieve it, we always end up doing 10% more” than the original realistic number.
4. The bottom is dropping out of tech sales
- Tech sales has been “up and to the right” for a decade and change; Teixeira thinks today’s world “is akin to what it was for many people that have been in this industry for 20, 30 years — and a lot of people just aren’t ready for it.” Those who entered on charisma and earning potential “are just going to give up and drop out.” His verdict: “it’s been easy for too long, and those easy times have bred a lot of mediocre talent.”
- Stebbings, bluntly: most salespeople and most sales leaders aren’t very good — “I think I’m a better sales leader than most of the sales leaders that I interview.” Teixeira: “I don’t disagree with you at all.”
- Should you fire the bottom 30%? The filter is skill versus will: falling behind because the product portfolio or sales motion changed is acceptable if someone puts in the reps; “it’s the ones that just sort of lazily blame their failures on anything but themselves” who drop off.
- On hiring from layoffs: there is good talent in them. Stebbings’s “Excel math” framing highlights that bottom performers can include people new to the org or coming off one bad quarter. Stebbings’s addition — look for shutdowns: if a whole product division is gone, that’s product-market-fit failure, not a performance signal.
5. Outbound became a 54% majority
- A year ago 1Password was “probably 99% inbound”; today converted deals run 54/46 in favor of outbound. Outbound deals “close at half the rate but they close for twice as much” — “the person we’re reaching out to doesn’t have a preconceived notion of what they want to buy; we are defining that from the get-go.” Enterprise averages ~2 quarters to close; outbound may take closer to 3-4 quarters.
- AEs must self-generate as soon as they are out of training, before any book of business — outbound is “about captivating interest, about getting to the point quickly on something that matters to the individual,” a muscle that makes the first discovery call better. BDRs still carry the majority of pipeline, but “AEs who don’t self-gen just doesn’t work.”
- The pre-outreach bar: “show that you give a s*” — research “bordering on stalking” of what the target is talking about and following, “not just blasting off a template to a thousand people hoping that ten of them get back to you.”
- On AI: outbound is viable in ‘24 but harder, and AI “should actually make it a lot easier” by dramatically accelerating research — but it won’t “work on autopilot and fill your inbox with leads.”
6. Hunter-farmer was a phase; structure follows how customers buy
- The origin story: when Teixeira landed, 1Password had already acquired 50,000 businesses with under 2% penetration — fanatical users bringing the product to work. One flavor of rep would have farmed the base and never gone outbound, so they deliberately created hunter/farmer friction. Next year they’re merging back into a hybrid model: with a multi-product portfolio and land-and-expand customers, “we were losing new business deals because we were pushing too hard to get too much upfront.”
- His character sketch of the two: farmers “explore all four corners,” build connection, are “way better active listeners”; hunters run a “fast-twitch muscle,” “trying to outrun a whole bunch of other lions for the same gazelle” — and sometimes hurry and leave money on the table.
- Not verticalized, deliberately: win rates, ACV, and time-to-close show “very, very little difference” across healthcare, banking, consumer — and no segment is saturated. The sequence is segments first (SMBs buy very differently from enterprise), territory splits now, verticalization later “so that we go deeper and wider.”
7. Segment economics: six-figure enterprise, 4x-payback SMB — and a ceiling
- Against Matt Plank’s line (quoted by Stebbings) that $5-25K ACVs are “where SaaS companies go to die”: 1Password’s enterprise deals are in the six figures — first seven-figure customer landed earlier this month — mid-market $50-100K, SMB from a few thousand to $25-30K.
- The SMB motion is intentionally thin: transactional, high-velocity, inbound-driven, low-touch CS — and “most of them pay for themselves four times over,” all costs loaded. Why not 10x it? “There’s a point at which you reach a ceiling”: unit economics cap it, so 1Password is moving that cohort toward MSPs and distributors — “10x-ing constantly starts to make less and less sense, which is a big part of why companies need to think about moving upmarket early on.”
- On the CS wars: CS should be comped on net dollar retention, overlapping with AE comp. In his model CS is “this impartial person who the customer sees as a trusted adviser, not somebody who’s just trying to cram more product down their throat,” while AEs stay strictly revenue-focused — “the body of work needs to get done” either way.
8. Sell the problem; the product is just proof
- Stebbings’s fundraising analogy — if you have to educate the buyer, don’t bother — gets a partial rebuttal: anchoring to the product is the real mistake. Attach to the problem, and “your product is just proof that the solution that you’re talking about is real and exists.” Nobody disputes weak credentials are a problem; how to solve it is the debate.
- What if they genuinely don’t care? His analogy: “It’s like me telling you that microphone six inches from your mouth is probably going to give you cancer — you’re like, yeah sure, well, everything will.” The job is contextualizing into what they already prioritize — employee safety, threat reduction — “not trying to create a new set of priorities.”
- The most common missed risk behind deals slipping: not mapping procurement end-to-end — “there’s always some surprise budget committee individual.” Selling a half-million-dollar deal to a manager whose budget holder doesn’t know the conversations are happening is “a huge red flag, because people are inherently bad at going back and selling the business case internally.”
- So 1Password coaches champions to sell internally: anticipate the CFO’s questions and hand over the answers “without asking anything in return.” And the CFO is now everywhere: “the CFO suddenly has an interest in absolutely everything” — even profitable 1Password runs constant cost rationalization, asking “could this other thing we’re using do it 80% as well for the same cost?”
9. Weekly inspection, human forecasting — no surprises allowed
- Pipeline inspection is weekly regardless of segment: SMB is daily pacing and pattern-matching against last month and last year; enterprise is account-level — “what needs to be true as part of this deal in order for us to win it, and what progress have we made this week.” The roll-up: AE takes inventory Monday → frontline leader probes and checks hygiene → second-line leader → forecast call with directs plus marketing and FP&A → exec summary.
- Stebbings calls it out — “can we not just hire AEs where we trust their pipeline?… it feels like every stage is a gatekeeper.” Teixeira: “unfortunately not… there’s too much emotion that’s involved in selling — ‘hey, I just had a great conversation with Harry, I think he’s going to buy.’” And the discipline pays off in morale management: if inspection is frequent enough “there should not be any surprises — and if there are, there’s something you missed.” When results are bad: call out the good, be brutally honest about what isn’t working, “attack the problem and not the person.”
- The stack: a CRM you’ll scale into (“I implemented Salesforce early on here; I’ve done CRM migrations before — it’s a pain in the butt”), Outreach and Gong early, plus an enablement tool (likely Flockjay, Highspot, Seismic) that surfaces the right content at the right stage. Newer: Momentum, which gauges customer sentiment and gives call-by-call suggestions. On Stebbings’s “why has Gong fallen asleep at the wheel” — Teixeira was one of Gong’s first 50 customers and wants the next tool to “work through the existing channels… feed me that through Slack, populate in Salesforce,” not another login.
10. The regret, the admiration, and the tactic that died
- One regret he mentions at 1Password: as a profitable business with cash “at a time when many companies were struggling,” they should have invested far more aggressively in product and engineering — build or buy — “and we chose to err on the side of caution or a middle ground.”
- Most impressive sales strategy of the year: likely Wiz. Not the growth itself — “the playbook of how you become a billion-dollar company is pretty well understood” (international expansion, multi-product, partners) — but the change-management cycles they likely needed to run it “from zero to 500 million in revenue over that compressed time frame.”
- The dying tactic: “this discount expires at the end of the month” — “that’s just dead.” Procurement has wised up, waits for the last day of the month, “makes the salesperson really, really sweat,” and desperation does the rest.
- He leads a remote sales team but emphasizes the value of in-person interaction: within 15 minutes in person “you can just tell who’s engaged, who’s in it, who’s full of it.” He misses “walking the halls… the casual chats by the coffee machine,” and is building centers of excellence to recover some of it.