Pioneers Insight Method Research Author
Did Trillion-Dollar IPOs Break The Social Contract?
Back to Episodes

Did Trillion-Dollar IPOs Break The Social Contract?

Summary

  • May CPI printed the highest year-over-year in three years — energy up 3.9% in May (over 60% of the monthly all-items increase), gasoline +40.5% YoY, payrolls at 172K versus 95K expected — and Avi’s conclusion is the Fed can’t cut: December hike odds jumped from 45% to 70%, Goldman dropped its cut call entirely, and “we’re going to see a call for a hike cycle.” Both hosts are heavy in cash; Jonah went to cash with about half his portfolio and says if you bought assets to trade since the Iran-war bottom, “maybe now is a good time to start cutting down.”
  • The episode’s title thesis: trillion-dollar IPOs have broken the social contract of public markets. Google IPO’d around $20B and Facebook at ~$100B; SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are coming out at $1–1.5T+, meaning “all of the returns are getting pulled forward into the private market” and index funds will likely deliver lower future returns — which is why people are chasing private-market access vehicles, sports betting, and likely Kalshi (“people feel a little bit jipped”; likely Polymarket is “getting cooked” by likely Kalshi).
  • The IPO lockup unlock flows into scarce assets, not back into markets: Avi’s Ferrari dealer cold-called to buy back his 458 at 4,400 (he paid $270K two years ago — “there’s no way I got paid 130K to go drive a supercar for two years”), Ferrari SP3s bought at $3–4M resell at $10–12M, Chanel bags have gone from ~$5K to $11–12K, and Ken Griffin bought a $44M Stegosaurus. Expect the money to go into Austin and SF real estate, Ferraris, Pokémon cards, and collectibles — AI workers “genuinely believe the best thing to own is their equity” and are unlikely, Avi thinks, to diversify into indexes.
  • The macro kill-switch is political: AI concentrates wealth further among the productive, and if Democrats win in 2028, “we are going to see huge pushes for redistribution” — “that’s probably going to end the bull market” — “everything is a fade until this happens and then just literally liquidate your assets and hide them.” That’s Avi’s case for Monero and Zcash: crypto’s real use case is capital flight from government overreach — “as two Jews, it would have been incredible if our ancestors had been able to take their wealth across the border when they fled Germany.”
  • Jonah’s contrarian risk ranking: everyone’s focused on AI models breaking markets and quantum risk, but “people should just focus on rate hikes.” Current froth is “a hangover from the zerp era” — none of these AI companies generate free cash flow that justifies a $1.75T valuation, everyone’s a day trader now (so technical analysis is working better than ever, but marginal buyers are close to their limit), and “we are in full froth mode.”
  • Specific levels and holds: gold re-entry at $3,300–3,500/oz (it’s selling off as central banks like Turkey monetize their hedge to defend the lira; Jonah still expects another mega-rally); rebid uranium/URA below 40, with 28–30 “a crazy buy”; and keep MLPX — up ~25% this year, inflation-linked pipeline cash flows, tax-efficient, “stable inflation-protected cash flows backed by mega trend thesis.”
  • The AI-era social thesis: the default path to success is gone. “In the 1980s you had to be a top 25% person. Now you have to be a top 5% person… in 10 years, top 1%” — and “a really, really, really intelligent lazy person is going to get totally smoked by somebody with medium IQ but with a crazy work ethic.” The playable edge is second-order: buy boomer businesses ahead of a “$60 trillion wealth transfer,” and own Google and Facebook as the landing zone for engineering budgets reallocated to marketing.

Deep dive

1. The default path is dead — only the self-motivated survive

  • The episode opens with the LA-parent consensus Jonah relays: for a curious kid with taste and values, AI is “rocket fuel”; without self-motivation, “getting the answer to anything on demand is just going to ruin your effing life.” Avi agrees 100% and generalizes it: all the value in society is being sucked up by top performers — “in the 1980s you had to be a top 25% person. Now you have to be a top 5% person, and in probably 10 years you’re going to have to be a top 1% person.”
  • Avi’s mechanism: technology is just leverage for the human — printing press, plane, and now AI “cutting down the cost of building… anything that has to do with manipulation on a computer, which is most of our economy.” So the question isn’t what AI can do (“basically everything at a certain point”) but what you ask it to do. His example as told: a guy who uploaded his Whoop stress data and cross-referenced it against coworkers to learn his product manager stressed him most and his senior dev least.
  • The trait society now filters for, in Avi’s line: “a really, really, really intelligent lazy person is going to get totally smoked by somebody with medium IQ but with a crazy work ethic — which is terrible for people like me.” Jonah, riffing on Kennedy (“ask not what AI can do for you, ask what you can do for AI”), concedes the credentialing system is broken — “somebody with hustle out of UC Santa Cruz could totally kick the ass of somebody like me out of Columbia” — and lands on “enthusiasm and creativity” as the new filter.

2. The trade is second-order — the frontier is already gone

  • Jonah’s crypto-honed framing: “shiny object phenomenon” — everyone’s fixated on SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI while the opportunity at the edge is the ~$60 trillion boomer-to-millennial wealth transfer, most of it equity in family-owned businesses “where AI hasn’t permeated because there’s a human gatekeeper.” His prescription: “it’s already too late to capitalize on the frontier of this — you have to look at the second, third, and fourth order knock-on effects,” whether that’s an AI-enabled yacht brokerage or setting up shop in Aspen ahead of the wealth.
  • Jonah’s money-conservation logic: fired salaries don’t disappear, they get reallocated — engineering budgets are moving wholesale to distribution and marketing, “which is one of the reasons I’m so bullish on Google and Facebook… they’re both producing AI, building data centers, AND they’re a direct beneficiary of the downstream effects.” He’s looking for spots to re-enter and concentrate in Google long-term.
  • Inside baseball on the pod itself: AI making media more lucrative is why they’re stepping up production and hiring — half the people Jonah knows have quit investment-banking jobs to buy companies, improve them with AI, and flip them to private equity. Both acknowledge the flip side plainly: “if you’re making a business more efficient, you probably are going to end up needing less people.”

3. Scarce assets are the new index — the Ferrari dealer is calling

  • Avi’s anecdote, told with numbers: bought a Ferrari 458 for $270K two years ago, put 4,000 miles on it, and today or yesterday the dealer cold-called offering 4,400 for a 13-year-old car — “there’s no way I got paid 130K to go drive a supercar for two years.” The dealer’s explanation: there are far more people worth $10M+ than three years ago, “they don’t know what to do with their money, and they’re buying scarce assets.” A Ferrari SP3 bought at $3–4M via dealer relationship immediately resells for $10–12M; AJ Scaramucci is reportedly setting up a vehicle to buy scarce assets and take them public.
  • Avi’s three-legged thesis for the scarce-asset bull run: the trillions-scale wealth transfer to under-35s who invest more actively in alternatives, the broken social contract (next section), and AI concentrating capital “even further among the productive.” His provocation: a Ferrari 599 “could massively outperform the NASDAQ in 5 years.” Even the dinosaur-bone thesis returns — Ken Griffin’s $44M Stegosaurus, and Avi eyeing a $44,000 skeleton he thought was an Archaeopteryx.
  • Jonah’s pushback — worth keeping: “I will respectfully debate the idea that putting your money into a used supercar is a good investment… please do not do that unless you’re really tasteful and good at cars.” His safer luxury comp: Birkins resell for triple immediately if you’re networked enough to get one, and a plain Chanel bag has gone from ~$5,000 to $11–12K — “compounding way faster than the S&P.” The distinction both accept: Ferrari plays the allocation-scarcity game like Hermès and Rolex; Lamborghinis you can just walk in and buy, so they depreciate.

4. Trillion-dollar IPOs broke the social contract

  • Avi’s core structural claim: SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic coming public at $1–1.5 trillion-plus valuations “has broken the social contract of the public markets with the American people.” Google IPO’d at roughly $20B, Facebook at ~$100B; wealth concentration lets private markets fund companies indefinitely — “if you have one person worth $100 billion and 99 people worth $1… you don’t need the money from the public markets.”
  • The tradeable implication: “all of the returns are getting pulled forward into the private market, and that by definition means index funds are probably going to have lower future returns than they did in the past — that would be my guess.” Hence the bid for private-market access vehicles (“these assets like robo strategy” — name garbled), and the boom in sports betting and likely Kalshi: “people feel a little bit jipped.” The likely Polymarket, by contrast, is “getting cooked” by likely Kalshi — no product direction, slower innovation, interface still too crypto-focused.
  • Jonah half-dissents on the accredited-investor complaint (referencing a Jordy tweet): retail did have its wealth-creation events — Bitcoin was a 30-million-x from the pizza, the Ethereum ICO ~130,000x — and crypto is “a phenomenal classroom for the anatomy of a wealth creation event,” instructive for how AI wealth will ripple into luxury goods and disrupted incumbents (his aside: “maybe just being short Verizon is a good bet if Starlink becomes a thing”).

5. Redistribution in 2028 is the bull-market kill-switch — and crypto’s real use case

  • Avi’s arc-of-history sweep: technology has always shrunk the set of useful people, “and today we’re hitting the apex of that.” His hammered conclusion: if Democrats win in 2028, expect huge redistribution pushes on even-worse wealth inequality — “that’s probably going to end the bull market.” Jonah: “that’s going to be the death knell, when the bell tolls… everything is a fade until this happens, and then just literally liquidate your assets and hide them.”
  • Jonah’s LA texture makes the political case concrete: the city “burned to the ground unnecessarily” with an empty reservoir, yet voters kept the incumbents — the message being “burn the rich, tax the rich.” He steelmans them via his union-lawyer father (“technology for technology’s sake should not be the goal of society”): displaced families facing insane cost of living “are not irrational to want redistribution, even if it comes at the hands of a candidate who’s obviously incompetent.”
  • That’s why Avi is “bullish on Monero, bullish on Zcash, bullish on owning money”: crypto’s enduring value is hiding capital from government overreach — “the government can’t seize it without physical force.” If a future law seizes assets over $100M by freezing bank accounts, “you’re cooked. It’s over.” The historical anchor, verbatim: “as two Jews, it would have been incredible if our ancestors had been able to take their wealth across the border when they fled Germany — but they couldn’t.” Jonah adds the Persian-community version: Iranians fleeing the revolution had their gold confiscated at the airport — “it is a metal, it will get detected.”

6. May CPI says hike cycle — both hosts are heavy in cash

  • The actual market call: May CPI printed the highest year-over-year in three years — energy +3.9% in May (over 60% of the monthly all-items increase), gasoline +40.5% YoY — while payrolls came in at 172K versus 95K expected. Avi’s read: the Fed can’t cut with the economy running hot; December hike odds jumped from 45% to 70%, Goldman dropped its cut call entirely, and “we’re going to see a call for a hike cycle” that hits markets short-term. He’s “still reasonably heavy in cash but as always looking to bid those mega trend assets,” and suggests trimming positions bought since the Iran-war bottom.
  • Jonah agrees and reframes the risk board: forget AI models breaking markets and quantum risk — “people should just focus on rate hikes.” The froth is “a hangover from the zerp era and profligate money printing of COVID,” resting on a shaky housing bubble and AI names where “none of these companies generate free cash flow… certainly wouldn’t justify a $1.75 trillion valuation.” Capital “is only abundant when you can borrow at SOFR plus 1% like Google” — whose campus wealth he skewers with the anecdote of Googlers using a $6,000 MacBook Turbo as an umbrella.
  • Froth signals stacking up: everyone’s a day trader (which means technical analysis “is working better than ever,” but also that “we’re probably close to the limit of marginal buyers”), JPMorgan wealth managers have cold-called Avi a hundred times in three weeks anticipating new money, and the Ferrari dealer is phoning owners unprompted. Jonah’s close: “we are in full froth mode. Just be careful out there.”

7. The unlock goes to Ferraris, not indexes

  • Both flag the large liquidity event on the horizon: SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI insiders have lockups but will borrow against their stakes, and that supply eventually hits the market. Avi’s categorical call on where it lands: “It’s going to go into Austin real estate, SF real estate, Ferraris, Pokémon cards, collectibles. I don’t think it’s going back in the markets” — because people who work at these companies “genuinely believe the best thing to own is their equity” and are unlikely, Avi thinks, to diversify out.
  • Jonah’s caveat keeps the pair honest: he’s not bearish or bullish, “just readying dry powder” — the two of them “called for caution a month right before this pullback. We were right about that.” Expect dispersion, not a uniform crash.

8. Trading around mega trends: gold, uranium, MLPX

  • Gold is down while inflation hits three-year highs, and Jonah dug into why: six years of central-bank accumulation was an inflation hedge, and now they’re monetizing the hedge — Turkey sold roughly half the gold it bought in five years and is borrowing against reserves to defend the crashing lira. Net-net central banks still buy, just slower, and “the price of gold is set at the margin.” Both call it reflexive amateur-hour flow — “they were buying it because it was up and now they’re selling it because it’s down.” Jonah still expects another mega rally and wants back in at $3,300–3,500/oz.
  • Uranium: the chart “looks absolutely terrible,” but Jonah is “still convicted in uranium as a mega trend bull thesis” — he’d rebid URA below 40, with the 28–30 breakout zone “a crazy buy” (probably unlikely to get there). The principle he wants understood: “you can trade around an asset to generate more P&L without believing the mega trend has changed in any meaningful way… price action doesn’t mean the thesis is broken.” He sees a 5–10x over 5–10 years as the US invests in nuclear output, pours billions into data-center buildout, and rejiggers its electrical grid.
  • Jonah’s favorite set-and-forget: MLPX, long since 2024 and up ~25% this year — “a REIT for pipelines.” Avi describes it as throwing off stable, inflation-linked, tax-efficient cash flows (depreciation shelters the royalty income). The thesis: “there’s never going to be a shortage of demand to move energy around the country” as data centers pull power and refinery geography shifts. “Everything’s down today; MLPX is up.” Jonah’s deployment bar for the cash pile: a December 2018 or March 2020-style rinse — “I want to get to the point where I’m tax-loss harvesting a big percentage of my portfolio” before plowing back in.

Verification Notes

  • Raw captions state the Ferrari buyback figure as “4400,” while nearby arithmetic implies a different amount; unresolved.