Summary

Apollo’s defining bet is that the winning asset manager will invest beside clients as a principal, not merely serve them as an agent. The firm manages just under $800 billion, is growing by roughly $150 billion annually, writes $1 billion-$2 billion of annuities each week, and has more than $300 billion on its own balance sheet through Athene—95% investment grade and 5% alternatives. Writing annuities at 4%-5% and investing near 6.5% makes Apollo “more merchant-focused, principal-focused, not agent-focused,” with its own capital occupying a large first-loss position.
Long-duration retirement liabilities are becoming a natural funding source for the generational build-out in power, compute, infrastructure, and defense. Apollo originated $260 billion of investment-grade and private-asset product last year, including an $11 billion Intel structure extending beyond 30 years: equity-like capital that Apollo viewed as more protected on the debt side. Zito’s call is that 10-, 20-, 30-, and sometimes 50-year liabilities match infrastructure better than short bank financing—and only a few investors can fund mega data centers with matched liabilities at the required scale.
America’s capital-market dominance is a more consequential asset than the current tariff debate. The US combines a $50 trillion debt market, unmatched venture density, rule of law, and a flywheel in which foreign savings return to American assets; Zito says most US equities trade roughly five to seven turns higher as a result. Yet Europe’s $24 trillion economy has only a $500 billion securitized market versus $15 trillion in the $30 trillion US economy, creating a multitrillion-dollar opening if Europe changes securitization rules and global pools seek another option.
The zero-rate era created alternative-investment promises that may be difficult to fulfill when leverage costs 6%-7%. Buying an unlevered asset yielding 5%-6% and funding it near zero worked; funding the same asset at its own yield does not support universal 15%-plus targets. Zito expects more normal outcomes—high-single-digit to low-double-digit returns—and argues that evergreen compounding can create more wealth than impressive drawdown-fund IRRs: in his illustration, 13% produced $330,000 while a reported 32% left only $180,000.
Apollo expects liquidity to dissolve the artificial boundary between public and private assets—and expand its addressable market from the alternatives sleeve to the entire portfolio. Secondary interests can already change hands at prices not far from 90, 92, or 96 in many conditions, while Apollo is testing private-IG market making, blockchain funds across five protocols, and eventual “365/24/7” trading. If a privately structured Intel obligation and a public Intel bond carry the same rating, Zito asks why investors should classify one as inherently riskier instead of optimizing risk-adjusted return across both.
Apollo’s moat is not simply having money; it is matching a precise credit box with 4,000 employees across origination businesses and investment teams that can allocate across 5%-20% return pools without fund-level walls. The firm spent just under $10 billion from 2014 through 2022 building or buying origination platforms, then crossed the Rubicon when it could originate more than its own balance sheet could service as rates rose 500 basis points—Zito’s “Lieutenant Dan on the ship” moment. Atlas shows the replication path: $28 billion of assets taken on, 180 hires, 280 warehouses, a scale Zito said was on pace for roughly $50 billion, and a long-term $100 billion ambition.
Carvana and Hertz demonstrate why flexible capital, creditor relationships, and speed can matter more than any single instrument. In Carvana, Apollo helped organize 90% of $5.5 billion of outstanding debt, rejected a coercive exchange, and reached a deal after bonds had fallen to 30; they exchanged near 90 and later traded around 120, while the stock ran from roughly $4 to $280. In Hertz, Apollo deployed about $10 billion across secured debt, DIP financing, securitization, preferred capital, and a platform acquisition—proof that “very few firms can move big and fast like that.”

Deep dive

1. Apollo turned asset management into a principal business

Zito’s career is a compressed history of modern credit. Loans once sat immovably on bank balance sheets; today the market issues roughly $500 billion of CLOs. In 2002-03, the $1.4 billion fund he helped Jim Kasberg build felt enormous, while Apollo now manages just under $800 billion and is adding about $150 billion annually.
The scale is concentrated in credit: Apollo originated $260 billion of investment-grade and private assets last year and writes $1 billion-$2 billion of annuities every week. Zito called that growth “crazy and hard for people to believe,” but also evidence that capital markets have been completely retooled.
Merging with Athene placed more than $300 billion on Apollo’s own balance sheet. That portfolio is 95% investment grade and 5% alternatives; Apollo might guarantee an annuity holder 4%-5%, invest the proceeds around 6.5%, and retain the balance.
The strategic distinction is alignment through capital at risk. Apollo remains a third-party asset manager, but it is also the largest investor in many of its products, building what Zito called a “more merchant-focused, principal-focused, not agent-focused asset manager.” He acknowledges that people question the model, but says Apollo believes it will win.

2. America’s capital-market premium is the asset at risk

Zito worries less about tariffs than about preserving America’s “effectively monopolistic position in capital markets.” His telling example: European founders can circulate a business plan locally and receive one term sheet in two weeks, then approach San Francisco and receive five the next day.
That density reinforces itself. The US offers the largest equity market, the best-developed venture ecosystem, a $50 trillion debt market, strong talent, rule of law, and clear rules of the road; global retirement systems consequently over-index to American assets, lowering domestic companies’ cost of capital and raising their growth ceiling.
Patrick’s framing—this may be America’s “most precious asset”—meets Zito’s warning that global pools now want an alternative. Europe has a $24 trillion economy but only about $500 billion of securitized assets, versus a $30 trillion US economy and $15 trillion securitized market.
Potential changes to European securitization rules could move assets off bank balance sheets and release liquidity for infrastructure and defense in Germany, France, and the wider Eurozone. Zito says most US equities trade roughly five to seven turns higher; he hopes policymakers recognize how much aggregate value that capital-market trust creates.

3. Fixed income needs artists, not “brown suits and bologna sandwiches”

Distribution innovated faster than fixed-income products. ETFs began in 1993, reached roughly $1 trillion around 2009, and now exceed $10 trillion, spanning sectors, access points, and tax advantages; daily-liquid fixed income, by contrast, has “not changed once in 25 years.” Apollo’s internal caricature is “brown suits and bologna sandwiches.”
Apollo responded by putting highly creative investors from an opportunistic, high-octane background into investment grade. Its $11 billion Intel transaction runs beyond 30 years and behaves like equity capital for the issuer while Apollo views it as more protected on the debt side—something too bespoke to obtain “off the shelf” from a bank.
Teams are instructed to find the best risk-return across the full capital structure, not force every opportunity into one fund’s mandate. Capital pools span roughly 5%-20% returns, from regular bonds to preferred rescues and buyouts. That “no walls” architecture also encourages repeat business: an investment-grade issuer today might need rescue capital in the next dislocation.
Zito says fees follow differentiation. Commoditized liquid investment-grade products have seen fees compress, while privately originated credit that diversifies existing portfolios should command compensation. Co-investment has also become a practical fee reducer as LPs build capable teams and increasingly co-underwrite risk.

4. Athene converted long liabilities into an origination flywheel

Athene’s founding insight followed the financial crisis: investment-grade spreads were wide, falling rates made long-duration liabilities cheaper, and incumbent insurers generally were not treating asset management as a growth business. The opportunity was to originate excess spread at comparable ratings and fund it with durable retirement liabilities.
Growth soon created an origination-capacity problem: Apollo needed enough assets to service its own balance sheet. From 2014 through 2022 it invested just under $10 billion building or acquiring platforms including PK AirFinance, Newfi, and Atlas, ultimately assembling about 4,000 employees who originate under brands clients may not recognize as Apollo-backed.
Those capabilities looked unattractive while rates were zero and investors were fleeing fixed income and credit for equity products, aggressively financed infrastructure, real estate, and other alternatives. When rates rose 500 basis points, Zito felt like “Lieutenant Dan on the ship”—Apollo had crossed the Rubicon and could originate more than its own balance sheet could service, enabling third-party investment-grade products investing beside it.
Apollo’s credit business is just under $700 billion. Slightly more than $300 billion is its balance sheet; third-party credit historically skewed toward direct lending, asset-backed finance, and other higher-returning, sub-investment-grade strategies. The newer frontier is fixed-income replacement, while the hybrid segment between performing credit and private equity is just over $80 billion.

5. Private investment-grade credit is becoming a corporate utility

Apollo’s 2020 InBev financing initially drew calls predicting it would never again fund an S&P 500 company that way. Investment-grade companies traditionally chose among banks, syndicated bonds, and equity; private credit carried connotations of distress. Apollo has since completed transactions for BP, Air France, Vonovia, and Intel, with a large pipeline behind them.
For a company already carrying $100 billion of debt, a $5 billion Apollo transaction can simply diversify funding. The structures are often off balance sheet, longer duration, tied to a particular asset, or designed with coupons that ramp alongside a project. Apollo may work with an issuer for six, nine, or 12 months to customize the answer.
Zito is careful not to predict the disappearance of banks or public bonds: private IG is “another option” and “here to stay.” Apollo’s brand still trails its business—some prospective issuers ask whether it remains only an equity or distressed investor—but every large branded transaction and repeat borrower chips away at that legacy perception.

6. Zero-rate return promises will not survive unchanged

“We created a whole alternative universe based on zero rates,” Zito argues. Buying an unlevered infrastructure or real-estate asset at 5%-6% and financing near zero generated attractive economics; financing the same asset at 6%-7% does not. The unresolved question is how much of the prior 15 years’ performance reflected operational excellence versus subsidized capital.
Pools were nevertheless raised on the premise that alternatives could deliver 15%-plus across environments. Zito’s verdict is deliberately plain: “That seems hard, seems really hard.” Today, many long-duration assets fit investment-grade liabilities better than expensive leveraged structures, although that could change when leverage becomes cheap again.
His evergreen-fund comic exposes the difference between quoted IRR and money compounded. Two savers begin with $100,000; one boasts of 32% in drawdown private-equity funds but ends with $180,000, while the other reports only 13% from evergreen strategies and reaches $330,000. Outside finance, he finds the result almost impossible to explain.
As evergreen distribution grows, Zito expects equity returns around high single digits to low double digits; credit could occupy a similar range depending on the rate cycle, whether it is levered or unlevered. The wealth tailwind remains substantial because 91% of private-wealth clients have no alternative allocation. Zito says the market is still in its early days: only a handful of trusted brands have enough product, and raising a dollar can sometimes take two or three years.

7. Liquidity will erase the public-private boundary

Zito’s high-level thesis is categorical: “All assets are gonna get more liquid over time.” More wealth capital will require a liquidity lever, driving secondary marketplaces and private-asset exchanges. Apollo is already testing private-IG market making, partnerships with State Street and Lord Abbett, and a first fund tokenized across five blockchain protocols.
The destination could be funds trading every day, “365/24/7,” even when their liquidity remains quarterly. Patrick’s pushback is important: how can an LP interest trade continuously when information about the fund and underlying companies is sparse? Zito’s answer is that a sizable secondary bid already exists, commonly around 90, 92, or 96 depending on manager, sector, and structure.
Pooling changes the execution economics because diversified private beta is easier to transfer than a single-name underwrite. Zito compares it with public fixed income: a portfolio of investment-grade bonds can trade at roughly three basis points, while one bond may cost half a point to a full point.
This convergence expands Apollo’s ambition from a client’s 20% alternatives sleeve to “100%” of the portfolio. If S&P rates both a private Intel obligation and Intel’s CUSIP bond BBB—and the private claim may also attach to a specific asset—Zito asks why “private” should automatically consume a riskier bucket rather than compete on risk-adjusted return.

8. Clear credit boxes and “thumb guys” keep scale entrepreneurial

Apollo’s cultural shorthand came from an Amherst football loss: “Thumb guys, finger guys. Don’t blame anyone else. Don’t be a finger guy.” Zito wants teams to own mistakes rather than point elsewhere, while preserving a flat environment where analysts and associates can challenge leaders and pursue ideas on merit.
His own rise benefited from Athene’s tailwind, but also from permission to experiment: large direct-lending commitments before they were common, a $12 billion balance-sheet partnership with Mubadala, and new asset-backed platforms. His public-markets DNA—small pools, “eat what you kill,” and constant attention to every line of risk—also taught him to create ideas and attract financing without relying on a large brand. Zito is “oddly over-indexed to change” and would rather disrupt Apollo internally than wait for another firm to do it.
For an origination platform, rule one is a precise credit box: what it buys, what it rejects, who decides, and how clearly decisions reach the sourcing channel. Ambiguity creates wasted work and eventually degrades the client-facing brand. “It sounds pretty simple,” Zito says, but execution at scale is surprisingly difficult.
Atlas is the specimen. Apollo took on $28 billion of Credit Suisse structured-product assets, partnered with MassMutual and two sovereigns, hired 180 people, installed a full CFO, CRO, and operating organization, and now controls 280 warehouses. The business is on pace, in Zito’s view, for roughly $50 billion, with a long-term ambition of $100 billion.

9. Carvana proved distressed credit can become positive-sum

Carvana moved from roughly a $500 million loss to a $1 billion gain for Apollo within about six months. Apollo entered through a JPMorgan syndicated deal in 2022, then bought another $750 million-$1 billion of bonds as they fell toward 30. The per-vehicle loss at the trough was about 100-150 basis points, but relentless headlines made it dominate investor meetings.
Zito repeatedly contacted Ernie Garcia before an obvious crisis existed, making perhaps 20 calls and attending two or three dinners despite Garcia’s suspicion. When Carvana prepared a coercive exchange, Apollo used long-standing credit-market relationships to organize about 90% of the company’s $5.5 billion of outstanding debt into a cooperation agreement.
The exchange offered security only if lenders accepted a steep haircut; the group refused, and the transaction failed. Adviser Ken Moelis warned that “Co-ops are made to say no,” but Zito insisted the group could accept a reasonable deal. They eventually met in Phoenix and negotiated one without taking the equity away from shareholders.
Bonds bought near 30 exchanged around 90 and traded near 120 a year later; Carvana’s stock ran from approximately $4 to $280. Apollo sold its stock near $15—“so we’re the idiots”—but Zito’s larger lesson was that honest, persistent access to the decision-maker and durable creditor relationships can make “one plus one” equal three.

10. Hertz showed what a whole-capital-structure platform can do

Zito predicted Hertz’s bankruptcy in 2016 and was “dead wrong for three, four years.” His thesis—Uber would reduce rentals, pricing would collapse, and used-car values would fall—arrived early. After COVID, management still said EBITDA was fine; Apollo bought several hundred million dollars of June insurance, and Hertz filed in May.
Apollo then bought the term loan near 60, effectively underwriting the company at a sub-billion-dollar valuation. It became the largest secured lender, supplied DIP capital, refinanced $4 billion of vehicle financing, acquired Hertz’s fleet-finance platform and combined it with Wheels, and later provided $2.5 billion of exit financing that was taken out near 130.
Across 12-18 months, Apollo committed roughly $10 billion through secured debt, securitization, preferred capital, and an operating-platform acquisition. Each solution helped earn the next call; deep familiarity let Zito commit to $2.5 billion in about 30 minutes. “Very few firms can move big and fast like that.”

11. Compute rewards giant balance sheets, while alpha still needs artists

Zito divides Apollo’s AI agenda into three layers: structure vast unstructured datasets and seek predictive signals; automate operations from custody and cash transfer through settlement; and build copilots that improve risk decisions. The warning is that systems can also produce bad advice, so skilled investors must define and train the governing framework.
Capital deployment may matter even more. Mega data centers require “astronomical” sums, while retirement liabilities can match their duration and hyperscalers generally offer strong counterparty quality. Zito sees Intel as only the beginning and expects Apollo to be among a handful of leading financiers; compute and defense are among its largest sectors growing quickly.
Core credit and equity managers may consolidate into mega-scale producers and distributors, but Zito believes family offices and endowments will always reserve room for “the small artist.” His advice is to build around something genuinely loved: clients can detect whether a manager’s process and product are authentic, even if they do not detect it on day one.
Meaning comes from originality, durable performance, and learning rather than money alone. Zito believes clients stay when managers perform, keep promises, and earn trust over long periods; finance also places him inside compute, oil and gas, software, and healthcare simultaneously. “It is the eternal learning center,” he says. “I don’t know how I stop.”

Muddy Waters' Darren McLean on investing in the mining sector Market Overview June 3, 2025